.
France-Europe-Planète Bleue
Imprimer au format A4 (Print)Inscrire un nouveau membre (New recipient)Le site officiel France Bleue Lettre IRC-Mars 2007 : Climat, Energie, Biocarburants, Océans... 3/4/2007

Archivage de documents pour les destinataires de notre lettre . Attention : appartient au Centre de Ressource IRC
     

IRC 79: March 2007

  Advanced Energy Technologies: Key Challenges to Their Development and Deployment

CLIMATE CHANGE

Allocating Allowances in a Greenhouse Gas Trading System.

National Commission in Energy Policy, March 2007

http://www.energycommission.org/files/contentFiles/
Allocating_Allowances_in_a_Greenhouse_Gas_
Trading_System_45f71a5fb536b.pdf

This paper aims to promote a better shared understanding of allocation: what it is, why it matters, and how policy-makers might go about designing an approach that is not only politically viable, but that fairly distributes the net burdens of regulation and seeks to maximize benefits to stakeholders and society as a whole. Reaching a consensus on allocation will not be easy--the subject is inherently complex and many of the decisions involved are fundamentally distributional in nature, making them difficult to adjudicate in a manner that satisfies all parties. Moreover, allocation debates are easily confounded by misperceptions, common among many stakeholders, about how allocation decisions do and do not affect the way an emissions trading program works in practice.

A Comparison of a Cap & Trade System v. Alternative Policies to Reduce U.S. Greenhouse Gases.

Presentation to the George C. Marshall Institute, Dr. Michael E. Canes, February 2007

http://www.marshall.org/pdf/materials/501.pdf

In this PowerPoint presentation, the author finds that the U.S. record in reducing its greenhouse gas (GHG) intensity through investment in R&D and voluntary partnership programs, and the prospective costs of a cap and trade system, suggest that the policy of continuing to develop and promote adoption of less GHG-intensive technologies without adversely affecting GDP is the best choice.

Global Scale Climate--Crop Yield Relationships and the Impacts of Recent Warming.

David Lobell, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, and Christophe Field, Department of Global Ecology, Stanford, March 2007

http://ej.iop.org/links/roFKK20Fs/DJ4KuNfd2xGyW_Jvav5vpA/erl7_1_014002.pdf

Changes in the global production of major crops are important drivers of food prices, food security and land use decisions. Average global yields for these commodities are determined by the performance of crops in millions of fields distributed across a range of management, soil and climate regimes. Despite the complexity of global food supply, simple measures of growing season temperatures and precipitation explain ~30% or more of year-to-year variations in global average yields for the world's six most widely grown crops. For wheat, maize and barley, there is a clearly negative response of global yields to increased temperatures. Based on these sensitivities and observed climate trends, the authors estimate that warming since 1981 has resulted in annual combined losses of these three crops representing roughly 40 Mt or $5 billion per year, as of 2002. While these impacts are small relative to the technological yield gains over the same period, the results demonstrate already occurring negative impacts of climate trends on crop yields at the global scale.

U.S. State and Regional Action on Climate Change.

Patrick Hogan, Pew Center on Global Climate Change, 2007 EIA Energy Outlook, Modeling, and Data Conference, March 28, 2007

http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/aeo/conf/pdf/hogan.pdf

The Energy Information Administration hosted its fifteenth annual 2007 EIA Energy Outlook, Modeling, and Data Conference on March 28, 2007. In this PowerPoint presentation, Patrick Hogan describes the state actions across the country, their GHG emissions targets and the regional initiatives.

ENERGY

Advanced Energy Technologies: Key Challenges to Their Development and Deployment.

U.S. GAO, February 28, 2007

http://www.gao.gov/cgi-bin/getrpt?GAO-07-550T

DOE's budget authority for energy R&D, when adjusted for inflation, fell 85 percent from its peak in fiscal year 1978 to fiscal year 2005. Energy R&D funding in the late 1970s was robust in response to constricted oil supplies and an ensuing energy crisis, but R&D funding plunged when oil prices returned to their historic levels in the mid-1980s. DOE's R&D efforts have resulted in steady incremental progress in reducing costs for renewable energy, reducing harmful emissions of coal-fired power plants, and improving safety and efficiency for nuclear energy. Nevertheless, the nation's dependence on conventional fossil fuels remains virtually the same as 30 years ago.

The Future of Coal. Options for a Carbon-Constrained World.

MIT, March 2007

http://web.mit.edu/coal/The_Future_of_Coal.pdf

This report evaluates the technologies and costs associated with the generation of electricity from coal along with those associated with the capture and sequestration of the carbon dioxide produced coal-based power generation. Growing electricity demand in the U.S. and in the world will require increases in all generation options (renewables, coal, and nuclear) in addition to increased efficiency and conservation in its use. Coal will continue to play a significant role in power generation and as such carbon dioxide management from it will become increasingly important. This study discusses the interrelated technical, economic, environmental and political challenges facing increased coal-based power generation while managing carbon dioxide emissions from this sector.

TXU’S Expansion Proposal: A Risk for Investors.

Ceres, February 25, 2007

http://www.ceres.org/pub/docs/TXU_report.pdf

Electric utilities have proposed 153 new coal-fired power plants with a combined 93GW of capacity across the United States. These new plants posed wide-ranging financial risks for investors, including shareholders of the power companies and of the banks financing the project. Of particular concern is a proposal by TXU Corp. to build eleven new coal-fired electric power units in Texas with a combined capacity of 9,000 MW and at an estimated cost of $10 billion.

OCEANS

Charting the Course for Ocean Science in the United States for the Next Decade: An Ocean Research Priorities Plan and Implementation Strategy.

Joint Subcommittee on Ocean Science and Technology, National Science and Technology Council (NSTC), January 26, 2007

http://ocean.ceq.gov/about/docs/orpp21607.pdf

This report is the first national effort to establish research priorities and interactions between society and the ocean. The report proposes that ocean science research focus on the following: forecast ocean and ocean-influenced processes and phenomena; support scientific ecosystem management; deploy an ocean-observing system; and assess the meridional overturning variability. These priorities will improve the understanding of the ocean's role in climate change.

U.S. Ocean Policy Report Card.

Joint Ocean Commission Initiative. January 30, 2007

http://www.jointoceancommission.org/images/report-card-06.pdf

This "report card" assesses progress made during the past year toward implementing recommendations made by the U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy for improving the health, productivity, and sustainability of oceans, coasts, and the Great Lakes. The 2006 overall grade is a C- (up from a D+ in 2005). During 2007, the Joint Initiative will continue to pursue governance reform, scientific advances, and funding initiatives at the congressional, administrative, regional and state levels.

FUELS AND BIOFUELS

Passenger Vehicle Fuel Economy: Preliminary Observations on Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards.

U.S. GAO, March 6, 2007

http://www.gao.gov/cgi-bin/getrpt?GAO-07-551T

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), the agency responsible for setting Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards for cars and light trucks--such as sport utility vehicles, minivans and pickup trucks--recently raised CAFE standards for light trucks to reduce oil use and restructured this part of the program to help address safety, among other issues. The CAFE standard for cars, however, has changed little over the past 2 decades. In 1975, Congress established CAFE standards for cars rising to 27.5 miles per gallon by 1985 but did not allow NHTSA to restructure how car standards are applied. As part of the administration's plan to meet the President's recently stated goal to reduce oil use by 20 percent over the administration's projected levels by 2017, the NHTSA Administrator submitted a plan to Congress that would allow NHTSA to reform the car CAFE program in a manner similar to NHTSA's recent changes to the light truck program.

The Promise of Biofuels. A Homegrown Approach to Breaking America's Oil Addiction.

Progressive Policy Institute, David J. Hayes, Roger Ballentine, & Jan Mazurek, March 2007

http://www.ppionline.org/documents/Biodiesel_030607.pdf

There are many reasons to promote biofuels like ethanol, biodiesel, and the coming generation of so-called "cellulosic" variants. The Progressive Policy Institute (PPI) shares proponents' enthusiasm about the great promise of biofuels. But PPI believes policymakers must temper their expectations with two important caveats, which should have a direct bearing on government initiatives. First, there is a natural limit to the amount of corn that U.S. farmers can grow to produce today's standard type of ethanol. At best, it is estimated that America can produce about 14 billion gallons of biofuels from corn without seriously disrupting feed and food markets. That would constitute less than 10 percent of the country's current annual motor fuel needs. The real promise of biofuels will be realized when the next generation of cellulosic biofuels can be brought to market.

RENEWABLES

Weighing the Costs and Benefits of State Renewables Portfolio Standards: A Comparative Analysis of State- Level Policy Impact Projections.

Cliff Chen, Ryan Wiser, and Mark Bolinger, March 2007

http://www.cleanenergyfunds.org/library/Reports/
LBL_Costs_and_Benefits_State_RPS.pdf

State renewables portfolio standards (RPS) have emerged as one of the most important policy drivers of renewable energy capacity expansion in the U.S. Collectively, these policies now apply to roughly 40% of U.S. electricity load, and may have substantial impacts on electricity markets, ratepayers, and local economies. This report synthesizes and analyzes the results and methodologies of 28 distinct state or utility level RPS cost impact analyses completed since 1998. Together, these studies model proposed or adopted RPS policies in 18 different states. The authors highlight the key findings of these studies on the costs and benefits of state RPS policies, examine the sensitivity of projected costs to model assumptions, assess the attributes of different modeling approaches, and suggest possible areas of improvement for future state RPS analysis.

HURRICANE

Katrina Index: Tracking Recovery of New Orleans and the Metro Area.

In collaboration with the Greater New Orleans Community Data Center, March 2007

http://www.gnocdc.org/KI/KatrinaIndex.pdf

Eighteen months after Hurricane Katrina, housing indicators are mixed, and economic indicators may be showing the first signs of increasing employment, but infrastructure indicators remain basically stalled. With hurricane season less than three months away, officials must take quick action to eliminate excessive red tape to ensure the flow of stalled federal recovery dollars to the Gulf Coast.

WASTES

Low-Level Radioactive Waste Management: Approaches Used by Foreign Countries May Provide Useful Lessons for Managing U.S. Radioactive Waste.

U.S. GAO, March 2007

http://www.gao.gov/cgi-bin/getrpt?GAO-07-221

Academic, industrial, medical, utility, and government entities in the United States, particularly the Department of Energy (DOE), disposed of at least 15 million cubic feet of low-level radioactive waste management in 2005. This waste includes debris, rubble, soils, paper, liquid, metals, and clothing that have been exposed to radioactivity or contaminated with radioactive material, and sealed radiological sources that are no longer useful for industrial or other applications. Other countries that have nuclear reactor units and use radioactive materials in other ways manage the residual LLRW in some ways that are different than in the United States. Most countries surveyed use national radioactive waste plans to guide the management of their radioactive wastes. Many representatives from LLRW generators, disposal operators, regulators, and others told GAO that the application of similar approaches to those used by other countries might improve the management of U.S. radioactive waste.

Veuillez trouver, dans le document ci-dessus, une sélection de rapports récemment publiés par le gouvernement américain ou par des centres de recherche, sur les thèmes du changement climatique, de l'énergie, des biofuels et des océans.
Monique Vianey

Information Resource Center
American Embassy, Paris

Contacts et informations sur :

 
http://france.usembassy.gov/irc/default.htm
Imprimer cette Weblettre